Quantcast
Channel: Robert Wiblin » Everything
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 50

Geoengineering as speculative existential risk

$
0
0

A new paper from one of the editors of Global Catastrophic Risk:

“Another partial solution of Fermi’s famous paradox is proposed, based on our increased understanding of geophysics, geo-engineering and climatology. It has been claimed in the recent astrobiological literature (for instance, in the recent controversial “rare Earth” theory of Ward and Brownlee), that geological activity of a terrestrial planet is an important precondition for the emergence of complex metazoan life forms. Technological civilizations arising on such planets will be, at some point of their histories or another, tempted to embark upon massive geo-engineering projects. If, for some reasons only very recently understood,large-scale geo-engineering is in fact much more dangerous than previously thought, the scenario in which at least some of the extraterrestrial civilizations in the Milky Way self destructin this manner gains plausibility. In addition, we speculate on possible reasons, both physical and culturological, which could make such a threat even more pertinent on an average Galactic terrestrial planet than on Earth.

We hereby propose an apocalyptic scenario of greenhouse gases vented from the Earth’s crust and mantle because humans undertook Stevenson’s MTEC macroproject,as a prototype of these additional existential risks. Since humans are currently without means of escape from the planet (the state-of-affairs likely to persist for at least several decades and probably much longer), and their Macro-engineering experiment meets with misfortune, they will perish as a species due to the excessive heat possibly Venuforming the Earth, i.e. permanent locking in the runaway greenhouse heating. Of course, it is possible that the Earth-biosphere continues to function and that subsequently, owing to the atmosphere’s increased perennial warmth10 and the aerial fertilization of expelled CO2, vegetation will be caused to flourish. Surface life forms must thereafter endure much different solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR): under heavy cloud cover the scattered UV component of sunlight—often termed “skylight”—is seldom less than 10% of that under a clear, blue sky; very heavy storm clouds canal most eliminate terrestrial UVR even in summertime.”

And here is a much less wildly speculative reason to worry about sudden climatic changes:

“A section of the Arctic Ocean seafloor that holds vast stores of frozen methane is showing signs of instability and widespread venting of the powerful greenhouse gas, according to the findings of an international research team led by University of Alaska Fairbanks scientists Natalia Shakhova and Igor Semiletov. The research results, published in the March 5 edition of the journal Science, show that the permafrost under the East Siberian Arctic Shelf, long thought to be an impermeable barrier sealing in methane, is perforated and is leaking large amounts of methane into the atmosphere. Release of even a fraction of the methane stored in the shelf could trigger abrupt climate warming.”

I haven’t had a chance to watch it yet but the first few minutes of Geoengineering: Global Salvation or Ruin? looked good.


Tagged: climate change, existential risk, geoengineering, speculation

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 50

Trending Articles